Problem: The atomic masses in the periodic table are not integral numbers. For example, carbon is listed as 12.01115 instead of 12.00000. What is the reason for this? A. Atoms gain and lose electrons easily, significantly changing their masses. B. Measurements taken of atomic samples are contaminated with other elements. C. Technology does not allow for exact measurements of such small quantities. D. The listed values are weighted averages of naturally occurring isotopes. E. There is a theoretical uncertainty in the masses of atoms.

FREE Expert Solution
95% (136 ratings)
Problem Details

The atomic masses in the periodic table are not integral numbers. For example, carbon is listed as 12.01115 instead of 12.00000. What is the reason for this?

A. Atoms gain and lose electrons easily, significantly changing their masses.

B. Measurements taken of atomic samples are contaminated with other elements.

C. Technology does not allow for exact measurements of such small quantities.

D. The listed values are weighted averages of naturally occurring isotopes.

E. There is a theoretical uncertainty in the masses of atoms.

Frequently Asked Questions

What scientific concept do you need to know in order to solve this problem?

Our tutors have indicated that to solve this problem you will need to apply the Atomic Mass concept. You can view video lessons to learn Atomic Mass. Or if you need more Atomic Mass practice, you can also practice Atomic Mass practice problems.

What is the difficulty of this problem?

Our tutors rated the difficulty ofThe atomic masses in the periodic table are not integral num...as low difficulty.

How long does this problem take to solve?

Our expert Chemistry tutor, Jules took 1 minute and 56 seconds to solve this problem. You can follow their steps in the video explanation above.

What professor is this problem relevant for?

Based on our data, we think this problem is relevant for Professor Maxwell's class at UCF.