Problem: Because biologists disagree about the details of phylogenies, some nonscientists argue that such disagreements warrant the questioning of evolutionary theory in its entirety. Why is this reasoning flawed?

FREE Expert Solution

Scientists debate about a lot of stuff such as evolutionary theory, physical laws, etc. However, these debates does not immediately disqualify the truth in those theories.

View Complete Written Solution
Problem Details

Because biologists disagree about the details of phylogenies, some nonscientists argue that such disagreements warrant the questioning of evolutionary theory in its entirety. Why is this reasoning flawed?